viernes, 6 de noviembre de 2015

The emotion battle:
John F. Kennedy and Fidel Castro

Bruno Betancourt del Toro
A01376339
“The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty, and all forms of human life.”
John F. Kennedy

All along the history of the humanity the world has experienced the great speakers that change history and hoe they have motivated people, armies and even countries with their speeches. These speakers have been very different from each other, but there are two that characterize themselves for using the emotional appeal to create an environment that helps their message get between and inside the listeners. These are John F. Kennedy and Fidel Castro.
Both of these speakers where two great leaders, John F. Kennedy, one of the most loved presidents of the United States of America, and Fidel Castro, the Cuban dictator that has been the face of the island for decades. Both of them made a reputation for themselves as good speakers, and lots of their speeches are now motivation to the growing generation of leaders.
Most of their success as speakers comes from their abilities to use emotional appeal, and we´re are going to analyze two specific speeches that are characterized by that. The “Ich bin ein Berliner” of John F. Kennedy, speech given in the city of West Berlin in 1963, and the speech given in the United Nations in New York by the Cuban dictator Fidel Castro in 1979. This two speeches have always been an example to young speakers on how to use emotional appeal to create an environment where the people that hear them get involved and motivated with the speaker´s words.
We can see this in several number of examples in both speeches. Inside the “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech we can find lots of phrases that emphasize the emotional appeal, perhaps the most obvious is the phrase that titles the speech. “Ich bin ein Berliner”. I am a citizen of Berlin, Kennedy says. This phrase becomes important and popular because of the moments that the citizens of Berlin where going through, most importantly the separation in the city, and the differences between the communist and capitalist sides. This creates a reaction in the crowds so strong that you can hear the people screaming because of their excitement in the recording. Also, the second example inside this speech is the phrase: “… Let them come to Berlin…” John F. Kennedy repeats this phrase whenever he refers to communism: “Whoever thinks that communism is the future, let them come to Berlin”, for example. This words became instantly famous, and because of the context and time when the speech was given, it became very important.
In the other hand, there are also lots of examples of phrases that characterize Castro´s speech. First of all, all along his speech he refers to the United Nation´s president, and before every topic he touches and speaks about he says: “Dear President; …” and “President…” this is very important due to the fact that the UN´s President is the biggest authority in the organization, and the fact that Castro refers to him and recommends the president things about the world, becomes very emotional. Similarly, Castro repeats in some parts of his speech the words: “It must cease”, for example;
The unequal exchange ruins our people. And must cease!
Inflation ruins our people. And must cease!
Protectionism ruins our people. And must cease!”
And again, all this word are dedicated to the UN´s president, which make the speech way more emotional.
Lots of phrases that both speakers say create enormous emotions between the listeners, and in Castro´s speech there are lots of other examples; “The exploitation of poor countries from rich countries must stop!” “Let’s say goodbye to weapons!” etc… In the other speech; “All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin, and, therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words: Ich bin ein Berliner!".
There are also differences between both speeches, starting from the purpose of the same. John F. Kennedy speaks and defends capitalism and why it is better from communism, and Castro talks about all the problems that societies have to battle with nowadays. These are two very different purposes, and speeches. Also, we can notice that the speech given by the American is way shorter and direct, talking about only one thing, while Castro´s speech is way longer and speaks of a lot of different things that refer to the health of humanity.
To conclude, we can notice that both characters where very important to their nations and to the whole world. The way they could manage the emotional appeal in their speeches was very important to their success. John F. Kennedy and Fidel Castro. Two big characters with two big voices.


N. of words: 807

lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2015

Kennedy And Castro: Emotions that move the world


Bruno Betancourt Del Toro   A01376339

THESIS STATEMENT:

The use of emotional appeal on speeches characterizes John F. Kennedy and Fidel Castro and their impact on societies.

INTRODUCTION

Fidel Castro. John F. Kennedy. Two very different nation representatives. Two similar speakers. Emotions lay between words of them, and hidden messages and phrases emphasize their speeches´ propose.

BODY

We can see the use of emotional appeal by both of them in two very specific speeches. The “Ich bin ein Berliner” by JFK in West Berlin. And, in the other hand, the speech given by Fidel Castro inside the United Nations. They both use phrases and examples that makes the listening crowd go crazy. In Berlin, John F. Kennedy shows the support of the United States towards capitalism and West Berlin, and in the UN, Castro talks about equality, freedom, education, and other values.

Both presidents have a lot of similarities between their speeches, both of them use their point of view of the world to create a very emotive environment. They both use lots of emotive phrases and words to create this environment that makes the people shout their names. For example, the simple fact of JFK saying that every capitalist nation, including the United States, and every person, including him, is a Berlin citizen, makes all the people that listen to him very emotive. That´s another similarity between the two speakers, since Castro also uses several statements that make the people very emotive, for example; “A nuclear bomb may kill hungry, sick, and ignorant, but it will never finish with the hunger, sickness, or ignorance.” These are only two examples…
Other examples of phrases that create this emotional environment may be…..


CONCLUSION

miércoles, 7 de octubre de 2015

Fidel Castro´s Speech

Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz


Cuban revolutionary and statesman. After leading the triumphant Cuban Revolution of 1959 , which brought together a broad spectrum of social sectors and political formations against servile and corrupt dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista, Fidel Castro immediately undertook a policy of socializing sign that included land reform and expropriation goods of American companies. The pressure from the United States, which in 1961 supported an unsuccessful attempt to invade the island, brought Castro to radicalize their positions and seek help from the USSR , and although the outcome of the so-called Missile Crisis (1962 ) ensured the survival Revolution, also undermined its independence, leaving the country aligned in the Soviet orbit.


(http://www.biografiasyvidas.com/biografia/c/castro_fidel.htm)


SPEECH


November 25th 1994



Theatre "Carlos Marx", Cuba








lunes, 5 de octubre de 2015

Dialect in Perspective

·         Is dialect a help or a hindrance? What resources does it make available for scene setting and characterization? Does it enlarge or restrict one's vocabulary?

i would say that it can be very handy in certain situations, Unless you don't know english very well, then it will confuse you and will make it harder to understand. It will also depend a lot of the location, and i think it enlarges a vocabulary.


·         How does dialect influence plot development and narration? Does it limit one to the "and then, and then" connection of incident to incident typical of oral storytelling? Does it open opportunities for sliding easily off on a tangent?

Also the narration can influence a lot in the way a person understands something, and yes, i think it can be confusing and a little hard to understand at first. but it does tend to get easier.


·         Comment on Twain's use of dialect, what goes into the dialect he creates—misspellings? grammatical mistakes? inventive punctuation? loose sentence structure? colloquial turns of phrase? Have students point out examples of each of these stylistic tricks and describe the tricks they used to create a dialect effect.

Well I think it can be a little difficut for people, including myself. but after all he wrote the stories to make people understand him, and although it can get confusing it really makes sense when you try to analyze it. like the constant switching of narrators.